I mentioned the other day the difficulty I had been having
in finding the actual written music, the score, the notes, whatever you like to
call it, of a piece of music a friend has to learn to play on the piano. These
days, to most people ‘Music’ means sound recordings. PCs come equipped with a
folder called ‘My Music’ and if you try to throw it away it keeps reappearing.
Whatever you put in it is assumed to be a sound recording, it tries to play it, and it takes some
ingenuity to convince the computer that actually what you want to keep there is
copies, usually in pdf, of printed music. Internet searches for music always
offer recordings first, and seem surprised and confused if you try to say ‘No,
I mean music, dammit, notes on paper.’ Learning to read music is no longer a
standard part of people’s education, and the ability to look at a piece of
music on paper and ‘see how it goes’ has become rare, which is a pity as it
opens a whole world of enjoyment.
In Bach’s day, composers usually put down just the notes and
little else, but nearly all modern editions of his music come with markings of
phrase, tempo, dynamics etc. These are often of doubtful authority; usually
just the ‘authority’ of playing traditions, which change. When, like me, one is
merely an elementary piano pupil, it is as well to take the teacher’s word
that, say, passages in quavers ‘should’ be played non-legato and ones in
semiquavers legato. But I sometimes waste half my weekly lesson arguing with
her, telling her I prefer it like this or that, and why not? I usually back
down, telling myself I can play it as I like once I have learnt to play it at
all.
I can’t just at the moment find an example of Bach’s
original manuscripts for, say, his two-part keyboard inventions, which I am
currently struggling with, but here is how he actually wrote the Kyrie from the
great Mass in B minor. There’s nothing there but the notes themselves:
No comments:
Post a Comment