I have had an e-mail from PEN, of which I am of course a
member, as all writers should be, asking for my support in a protest against
the proposed banning of someone or other’s memoirs. (Albert Speer’s, Auntie
Ida’s — it doesn’t matter whose, the principle is the same). Naturally I
support the protest — there are never any grounds for banning a book. The
purported grounds this time are that publication might cause psychological
distress to someone or other. (Again, it doesn’t matter who.)
If we are to ban a book because it might cause someone
psychological distress, then we shall have to ban everything from the Epic of
Gilgamesh to the present day. I myself am caused psychological distress by the
books — one can hardly call them works — of Jeffrey Archer. Should they
therefore be banned? Actually, come to think of it …
No comments:
Post a Comment