To a much greater extent than the BBC is of the British
State, The VOA is the mouthpiece of the United States Government. Listening to
it is much the same, and needs the same skills as, listening to an American
politician, ‘Government Spokesperson’, or President. Above all, one is not listening to the ‘Voice of America’ — the ordinary decent people of America.
What are the above-mentioned skills? well, if you read
poetry properly, listen (I mean really listen)
to music, or can understand and even take part in a conversation in a language
other than your mother tongue, then you already have these skills. As you listen
to the VOA, (the president, the government spokesperson, the politician), you
turn on these skills, as you might shove a Babel-fish in your ear. Some
examples:
When the President says ‘I did not have sex with that woman’
he is not exactly lying: he’s using ‘Have sex’ in a special sense; a sense in
which many things we lesser mortals had thought were ‘sex’ are excluded.
Fellatio, Cunnilingus, and no doubt all sorts of other fun things are not, in
the VOA-President-Politician-Government-Spokesperson sense, sex.
When the VOAPPGS says ‘America does not practice torture’,
your babel-fish should explain that this means ‘Heavens no! We pay foreigners
to do it abroad for us’, or sometimes, rather as it is with ‘Having Sex’, ‘Torture’
is being used here in a special sense: tying someone to a plank and pouring
water into his mouth until he is just on the point of drowning, reviving him,
then repeating the process over and over again until between bouts he gasps out
whatever he thinks you want him to say, is not (in this special sense) ‘Torture’:
it is an ‘Enhanced Interrogation Technique’.
Sometimes one hardly needs one’s babel-fish: when the VOAPPGS
says ‘We shall continue to monitor the situation and consider appropriate
action’ you need little more than average intelligence to work out that VOAPPGS
has found an ingenious and impressive-sounding way of saying absolutely nothing
at all.
At weekends, VOA’s international news is replaced by
something called ‘Encounter’, which is advertised as ‘A free-wheeling,
no-holds-barred programme in which advocates and opponents meet to discuss
important issues in the news.’ For instance, the ‘Advocate’ might say that
America should send many more troops to Iraq, while the ‘Opponent’ says no, no
more troops, or not many, but lots more ‘Military Advisors’. They range freely
over the whole gamut of views from A to B. No-one would suggest that perhaps
America shouldn’t be there at all, still less would America’s God-given duty to
be the world’s policeman be questioned.
So why would one bother to listen to the VOA? Well, provided
you can keep your cool and a robust sense of humour, and make sure your
babel-fish is in good health, you can learn a lot from the VOA. Certainly far
more than from the BBC’s relentless dumbed-down populism, rushing to get the
dull stuff out of the way so as to concentrate on ‘Sport’.
No comments:
Post a Comment