E. M. Forster said quite famously that he was sure he was
not a great novelist.
No-one has ever agreed with him and I don’t know why he said
it. It’s unlikely to have been false modesty and even more unlikely that he’d
read Northrop Frye — still less I. A. Richards or the Leavises — and so known all
about literary criticism and what novels ‘ought’ to be ‘like’.
I saw him once, sitting quietly alone in an alcove of the
Senior Common Room Bar at King’s Cambridge. (Him, not me: I was sitting noisily with friends in another alcove.) I’ve regretted ever since not
having had the nerve or the gaucherie (of which I usually have too much) to go
up and talk to him. I was much younger then and apparently quite attractive;
had I but known it he might have been quite pleased to let me sit with him and
buy him another drink — I seem to remember he drank bottled light ale. So I
lost my chance to ask him why he didn’t think he was a great novelist, and my
chance (in the unlikely event of their having the slightest idea who he was) to
say airily to my awed nephews ‘Oh, we talked about Rupert Brooke’ or pre-First
World War motorbikes or whatever.
Anyway, I thought I’d read all Forster’s novels, but tidying
my fiction shelves the other day I found ‘The Longest Journey’ and realized I’d
never read it. Apparently it was Forster’s own favourite. It’s a very strange
book, and must have seemed even stranger in 1907 when it was published. The
fact that the plot concerns class distinction and rigid rules of social and
especially sexual conduct only add extra strangeness for modern readers who can’t
or won’t make an imaginative leap into the mores of its time. I won’t or
perhaps can’t try a proper ‘review’, which would anyway frighten off even more
of my readers, but there’s one little or perhaps not so little thing that
struck me, and that it has in common with all his novels:
It’s the presence of a special significant place.
Significant, but nothing so crass as ‘Symbolic’. As I say, it happens in all
his novels. The best known, probably mainly because of the film, is the Malabar
Caves in ‘A Passage to India’. People like to talk with an air of profundity and
erudition of ‘What really happened in the Malabar Caves?’, meaning they have no
idea but want to sound clever. Sometimes these special places seem, in the
narrator’s mind and so I suppose in Forster’s, to be imbued with an almost
supernatural significance. In two of his stories — ‘A Room with a View’ and one
of the short stories — it’s more than ‘almost’. People, usually a man and a
woman but sometimes two men, are overcome by something like panic, or rather
Panic: possession by the Great God Pan.
There are two such places in ‘The Longest Journey’. (There
might be more; I’m only halfway through the book.) One is, rather prosaically,
a little grove or bower off the Madingley Road in Cambridge, and it’s here that
Rickie and Agnes at last acknowledge that they are in love with each other. The
other is an ancient hill fort somewhere near Salisbury, and it’s there that
Stephen Wonham and Rickie realize, or half-realize, that they are brothers, or
half-brothers.
That’s it, I’m afraid: I have no point to make; it’s just
something that struck me. But if you haven’t read E. M. Forster, do so.
Oh yes; your picture. I’ll find one of Edwin Morgan Forster.
This is about how he looked when I saw him.
No comments:
Post a Comment